It’s not just their speech, it’s yours, too!

(Not up to speed on what happened at Charlottesville? Here me explain it in my own words below)

This is Jason Kessler. Some of you may know me as the permit holder of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in August 2017.

In the nearly five years following the rally, I have been subjected to more abuses and provocations than most people could imagine. I have been smeared as a “Nazi” by activists in the mainstream media, and sites like Wikipedia. I have been blamed for the death of Heather Heyer, even though subsequent investigations by the Charlottesville Police Department and the FBI found there was no conspiracy or even communication between James Alex Fields Jr. and the organizers of the rally.

I was the second person ever de-verified from Twitter, and banned from YouTube. They were putting strikes onto videos I hadn’t even published, which told me it was somebody inside the company who had it in for me. The purported reason for my ban was for “hate speech,” although I didn’t even have any videos about race, and spoke almost exclusively about the government abuse I had been subjected to in Charlottesville, including videos of police officers physically and verbally assaulting me, and breaking my recording equipment.

My personal websites were pulled down a few days after the rally, for “violating terms of service”—although they never explained what the violation was—so I couldn’t get my side of the story out to the public. In 2020, I would be banned from personal banking with Wells Fargo, a bank I had been with for many years, with no issues, because of “risk.”

The media, which gleefully hunted down identities of protesters so they could be fired from their jobs and ostracized by their friends and family, had no interest whatsoever in pursuing the government misconduct uncovered in the “Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville Virginia.”

The rally set off a tidal wave of censorship across Silicon Valley which has now engulfed not only members of the alt-right but mainstream politicians, including former President Donald Trump.

Although my own conduct in organizing the rally was First Amendment-protected and legally blameless, vindictive county and city prosecutors charged me with multiple criminal offenses, unrelated to the rally. All of these meritless charges were dismissed in court, but further drained my funds—$3,500, which was a lot of money to me at that time—as I desperately needed financial resources to pursue civil rights litigation for the sabotage that occurred at the rally.

On top of that, the ACLU of Virginia dropped me as a client right after the rally, and I went to work furiously calling every law firm and then every prominent free speech law firm in the country. The task seemed insurmountable. One of the few law firms willing to take our case wanted an obscene retainer of over $100,000. Of course, at the time, I was so radioactive I couldn’t even hold down a job.

I tried to set up legal fundraisers, to sue the City of Charlottesville—for the stand-down preventing me and others from speaking, violating our First Amendment rights—but they were shut down by GoFundMe, PayPal, Stripe, Patreon, and many others.

Thankfully, in October 2017 I was able to find like-minded and sympathetic attorneys who didn’t require an enormous up-front retainer.

No sooner had we found attorneys to sue the City of Charlottesville, than powerful interests started filing lawsuits of their own against us. The most prominent of these was Sines v. Kessler, filed by 10 Charlottesville residents against me and 14 rally organizers, on October 11, 2017, claiming they allegedly suffered some injury related to the rallies.

Sines is funded by powerful Democrat-connected attorneys, hedge fund managers, and Silicon Valley titans. The lead attorney—radical lesbian Roberta Kaplan—is known for having litigated the U.S. Supreme Court case legalizing gay marriage, and also representing sleazy Hollywood types like Harvey Weinstein. When Kaplan spoke about Sines at a San Francisco synagogue in 2019, she bragged that “wiping out the finances of these groups and individuals is key to the plan.”

The lawsuit Kessler v. City of Charlottesville, where I am a plaintiff, alleges a conspiracy between Charlottesville government officials and Virginia State Police to curtail First Amendment-protected speech. We claimed violation of our First Amendment rights by arguing state and local officials used the expected violence from Antifa and Black Lives Matter as a pretext to declare an unlawful assembly and curtail our speeches before they could occur. Police should have had an affirmative duty to separate the sides or try to stop the violence in some way before leaping immediately to the step of disbanding the rally.

The court authored an outrageous opinion dismissing our case, claiming police had no duty to protect us from counter-protester violence. On June 29, 2020, we filed for appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond. I have attached our appeal brief for your review. We’re awaiting a ruling that should come later this year. If necessary, we’ll take our case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Sines trial began in late October 2021 and lasted four weeks, butting up against the Thanksgiving holiday. The result was a mixed verdict in which the two federal conspiracy claims against Charlottesville protesters were hung, but we were found liable under some Virginia statutes.

We have to appeal these outrageous, politically biased verdicts on the Virginia statutes. For instance, I was found liable and ordered to pay over $200,000 to two far-left radicals for “racial violence and harassment” at the August 11 torch protest. But no evidence was presented that I touched either of them or said a word to them. Both plaintiffs testified that they didn’t even see me that night.

Overturning this bogus verdict, an assault on my political speech and yours, is critical to undermining the legitimacy of the jury’s verdict and exposing their prejudice.

The reason the jury ruled against us on those claims was, according to one source, because a really angry Black female juror was acting as a ringleader against the defendants, haranguing the other jurors until they agreed to her demands. Considering the lack of any evidentiary basis to the judgment, our attorneys expect there will be strong grounds to have this overturned.

The legacy of Charlottesville has now been weighed down in litigation for the last five years. The cost has been enormous. We are talking thousands of dollars each month, per defendant. The cost of going to trial last October stretched into the tens of thousands of dollars.

Thank you for taking the time to learn a side of the Charlottesville story you may not have been aware of. If powerful interests squelching our God-given free speech rights angers you as much as it does me, and you’d like to help us in the battle against those attempting to erase views and opinions other than theirs, any support you can give would be greatly appreciated, and there are a number of ways you can contribute.

You can donate online, using a debit or credit card, through BuyMeACoffee or DonationAlerts.

You can also send Bitcoin to the address:

1EsUzC6NjpMNj7DA9qmN5VxtFDsPeCbCNu

If you would like to mail cash, check or money order, make it out to Jason Kessler and send to:

Jason Kessler                                                                                                                                            6256 Bullet Drive                                                                                                                                    Crestview, FL 32536

If you are committed to this fight as much as I am, one of the most effective ways to help is through a monthly donation subscription, directly through my attorney, of $100 or $200 per month. Or any amount that you’re comfortable with. Please email me at themaddimension@gmail.com if you’d like to select this option.

For further information please visit my website: JasonKessler.us

By Jason Kessler (tip me) (follow me)

(UPDATE: 8/18/22) Groyper General Alejandro Richard Velasquez Gomez, aka “Latino Zoomer”, (pictured below) was just charged with possession of child pornography. Fuentes had previously stated that he “loves” Latino Zoomer and defended him against allegations related to the grooming of a 13 year old child.

A persistent social media criticism of Nicholas Fuentes’ “America First” movement has been allegations of support for pedophilia, pederasty and attraction to underage children. Unfortunately, many of the allegations appear to be based in fact and range from condoning underage sex, admissions to sex with girls as young as 13, masturbating to illustrations of children, allegations of grooming and tolerance of known pedophiles in the America First crew.

According to America First activists Fuentes and Anthime Gionet (aka “Baked Alaska”) the only thing immoral about sexual contact between “much older men” and underage girls is if its done outside of wedlock. Fuentes tells his audience that sex with young girls “past the point of puberty” is fine but should be done in marriage. For reference, girls typically reach puberty between the ages of 8 and 13 years old.

Marriage to very young brides is still practiced in some parts of the world, like Afghanistan.

When allegations arose that America First aligned Congressman Matt Gaetz had paid for sex with a minor and was under investigation for sex trafficking, Fuentes lept to his defense. “17 years old? What is even the big deal,” he wrote on March 30, 2021. But it wasn’t the first time Fuentes had argued against age of consent laws. His arguments for sexual intercourse would include children much lower than 17.

The November 10, 2017 broadcast of “America First” was titled “Roy Moore Did Nothing Wrong” in reference to allegations that Judge Roy Moore, an Alabama senate candidate, had sexual relationships with a number of underage girls, including one who was just 14 years old when he was 32.

Nick Fuentes – Abolish Age of Consent Laws

Accuser Leigh Corfman alleged that when she was 14 years old Moore removed her clothing and stripped to his white underwear before molesting her and trying to get her to touch him.

In total, 8 women came forward with assault allegations, 6 of whom were underage at the time.

Fuentes argued that “the whole age of consent thing is just a social construct.” He implied that because some American states have age of consent at 18, others at 17, or even 16 and some foreign countries even lower than that (Nigeria is the lowest at 11) therefore age of consent is just arbitrary. In his view, puberty should be the standard in determining. whether someone is a “grown adult.” 

“Do we really believe that you have to be 18 years old to consent to sex otherwise its rape? Are we really supposed to believe that people, adults, grown adults who are passed the point of puberty engage in a relationship and that becomes a rape?”

On another broadcast, defending the Gaetz allegations Fuentes said, “Maybe we as a society need to reconsider what constitutes moral sexuality. Because we live in a society where age of consent law is the gospel.”

”If you violate that, ‘Crucify the man!’ Female teachers are having sex with middle school boys all the time, nobody cares about that. But its, uh, a large age gap between an older man and a younger woman, God forbid.”

Nick Fuentes – Nothing Immoral About Sex With Underage Children

On one broadcast of his show, Fuentes waxed profusely about the attractiveness of 15 year old Tik Tok star Charli D’Amelio. Fuentes was 22 years old at the time. When he wasn’t aware that she was underage he seemed unenthusiastic about her attractiveness (“She’s pretty don’t get me wrong. But this is not someone that I’m like, “Whoa! This is a knockout!”). But after learning she was only 15 became much more attracted to the girl and aggressive in insisting, “Charli D’Amelio: HOT! I’m just gonna say it….She’s hot!”

 Nick Fuentes – 15 Year Old Girl is Hot

Disturbing beliefs about underage sex are common among Fuentes’ inner circle. Baked Alaska, for instance, echoed his sentiment that, “Roy Moore Did Nothing Wrong. ”

On another occasion Baked Alaska hit on a 13 year old girl, asking for her phone number. He joked that he’d “grab her by the pussy” and cupped his hands as if to grope her breasts.

Baked Alaska Hits On 13 Year Old Child

On one livestream in 2021, Baked Alaska went to the bar with his friend “Chaggot”, a former employee of AFPAC 3 speaker Jesse Lee Peterson and an AFPAC 2 attendee who claims to speak with Fuentes daily. “Chaggot” (real name Dylan Volk) is a self-admitted pedophile who had sex with a 13 year old girl when he was an 18 year old adult. During the broadcast, the two wander around the streets asking random passerby whether or not it was immoral for “Chaggot” to sleep with the 13 year old.

Anthime Gionet, better known as Baked Alaska, streamed himself with his friend "Chaggot" asking people what they thought of Chaggot sleeping with a 13-year-old when he was 18. pic.twitter.com/jC2hj34y2a

— The Spectre Report (@TheSpectreRep) May 27, 2021

Baked Alaska himself defends the man stating, “I don’t think that you’re a pedophile” and insisting the only thing immoral about the sexual act was premarital sex.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/YHKbkbBKvwWL/

Baked Alaska Defends Pedophile

During the stream Baked Alaska promises to defend “Chaggot’s” actions to the livestream audience. “We’re backing you up. We said you’re not a pedo. You didn’t molest anyone.”

A streamer known as “Woozuh” jumps in and tells the viewers on his stream that, “Its not rape, child molestation, pedophilia. That is messed up that you would frame it like that.” Woozuh is yet another “special guest” listed on the AFPAC 3 poster.

Baked Alaska has faced his own grooming and underage sexual abuse allegations. For example one source stated, “Baked Alaska used to groom me when I was like 16” and “Baked Alaska preyed on me when I was underage.” Another said, “”Baked Alaska tried to fuck my friend when she was underage.”

Fuentes’ friend Tor Gustafsson Brookes, aka “Lolisocks”, aka “Catboy Kami” has repeatedly faced accusations of pedophilia and attraction to children. Kami is a streamer from Australia who is part of the flamboyantly homoerotic “catboi” and weeaboo cultures. He brought a lot of criticism onto Fuentes in January 2020 when a video surfaced of the two men on an intimate outing around the town. Many accused the two of being lovers (which Fuentes has denied).

Kami’s political livestreams have included appearing in blackface and using racial slurs on Omegle streams with young Black children.

As part of the America First crew, Kami attended a November 2020 “Stop the Steal” rally in Arizona with Baked Alaska. Baked Alaska introduced him and cheered Kami on as he gave a speech calling Jews “rats in human form” before a crowd of MAGA faithful. Later Kami told a reporter, “I’m Catboy Kami and I hate niggers.”

Kami’s former moniker of “LoliSocks” referred to his obsession with “Loli” porn, featuring animated depictions of prepubescent girls in sexual situations. The bedroom from which he livestreams is covered in sexually explicit cartoons of Loli girls.

Kami frequently wears clothing depicting prepubescent girls, including on his infamous livestream with Fuentes.

On several occasions Kami has admitted that he masturbates to illustrated images of children. (Timestamp: 13 minutes and 5 seconds)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/f8Ss9SCpJuiy/

Pedophile Catboy Kami Admits Masturbating to Illustrations of Children

In one instance a streamer named LeoPirate asked him,”(During a livestream) One of the guys joked about you masturbating to children and you corrected him: ‘No, no I masturbate to anime Lolis. Big difference.’ Do you actually masturbate to Lolicon, to illustrated images of children?”

“I have jacked off to Loli hentai in the past,” Kami admitted.

On February 23, 2020, Kami tweeted, “People say I’m a pedophile for finding THIS attractive” along with an animated depiction of a prepubescent girl. He exhorted his haters “if you don’t think she’s hot…you’re gay as fuck.”

Kami has also tweeted about his belief that forced intercourse is not rape because, “Rape is not real.”

Archive Link

America First promoter Andrew Anglin was a big fan of Catboy Kami, calling him “the hero we deserve.” Anglin himself has had inappropriate relationships with underage girls as a sex tourist in the Philippines.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/O9UVUYjLDBx3/

Andrew Anglin with his self-described “jailbait girlfriend” in the Philippines

Fuentes’ rise to prominence began in early 2018 with the patronage of Andrew Anglin and his Daily Stormer website, which has been described as the leading Neo-Nazi website on the internet. In a February 23, 2018 post Anglin wrote, “Understand this, friends: Nick Fuentes and Paul Nehlen are giving us the model for the future of the pro-white, anti-Jewish movement. I am officially declaring that.” And, “It’s CPAC day. And that means Nick Fuentes is murdering Jews.”

Fuentes communicates about Anglin using coded language, as he did on the November 5, 2019 broadcast of America First saying, “I know that (Anglin) has been very supportive,” Fuentes said in response to a viewer question. “And I appreciate that … I really do appreciate his support.”

Some might also point to Fuentes’ association with Milo Yiannopoulos, a key America First ally and featured speaker at AFPAC 3. 

In the context of being molested as a boy by his Catholic priest, Yiannopoulos defended homosexual pedophilia, “In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationships — the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable sort of rock.”

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Op5d6bSsrBiy/

“Milo likes young White guys”

The saga of disgraced pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who introduced famous men to very young girls, has been a fixation of the Right for years. Alex Jones has used it as proof to vindicate his salacious theories about pedophile rings among the elite. There are numerous clips of him shouting about “pedophile demons” as though this is a cause he cares very much about.

And yet Jones, and a large segment of the American Right, are getting in bed (so to speak) with this clique who are justifying the sexual abuse of young girls and in some cases acting on it. The house should be cleaned of pedophiles and their apologists or figures like Alex Jones are nothing more than enabling hypocrites.

Jason Kessler is an independent journalist. If you appreciate this content, please consider making a donation to making this work possible.

Plaintiffs in a free speech case stemming from the 2017 Unite the Right rally have filed a Motion to Recuse two law clerks writing the opinions of Judge Norman K Moon citing unacceptable bias within his courtroom.

Incredibly, Judge Moon’s opinions in multiple cases stemming from the rally have been written by close personal friends of Elizabeth Sines, a woman suing rally organisers. Further evidence shows that Judge Moon’s clerks going back to 2018 are 1. Material fact witnesses in the cases 2. Friends of an opposing litigant and 3. Have made several prejudicial statements about rally organisers before being hired to decide matters in these cases.

Information about the two law clerks, Hutton Marshall and Joshua Lefebvre, was uncovered last month and was released in the Twitter thread below:

What if I was to tell you that Judge Moon does not actually write his opinions? Would you be surprised to know the people writing Judge Moon’s opinions are: 1. Friends with Elizabeth Sines 2. Coworkers of Amy Spitalnick 3. Left wing activists with ties to Antifa?

First you must understand what a law clerk does. A law clerk is not a clerk in a traditional sense. These are people who are actually reading the case law, writing the opinions and then passing it off to the judge. Especially one as old as Judge Moon who falls asleep in court.

“The vast majority of federal judges — as high as 95 percent, according to one study — delegate to their law clerks the task of drafting judicial opinions. In other words, most judges don’t write their own opinions” (Source: AboveTheLaw.com)

As it is well known within the legal community, clerks are widely known to write as many as 95% of rulings for federal judges.

1. Hutton Marshall is listed as the law clerk for Judge Norman Moon in the article, Who’s Clerking for the 2019 Term

2. Hutton Marshall’s LinkedIn page shows that this information is current for the 2020 term https://www.linkedin.com/in/hutton-marshall-b025a55a

3. Hutton Marshall worked with Amy Spitalnick, Executive Director of Integrity First for America, at the Office of the New York State Attorney General’s Office. Integrity First is the organization founded by Roberta Kaplan behind the lawsuits against UTR attendees.

4. Hutton Marshall is “BEST OF FRIENDS” with Sines v Kessler lead plaintiff Elizabeth Sines. Those are her words in this image from his Facebook page. Hutton’s fiance liked the comment. This picture is currently Hutton’s header image

5. Hutton is a left-wing activist who advocates for illegal immigration while ostensibly serving the law.

6. Hutton wrote at a social justice publication for gay rights and culture.

7. Hutton Marshall has ties to Antifa. The “Cody Thompson” account below signifies his affiliation with the three downward facing arrows you see below.

8. You must surely think this is over, right? No sir… What if I was to tell you that Judge Moon has ANOTHER CLERK who is a possible MATERIAL WITNESS to the events of August 11 & another close personal friend of plaintiff Elizabeth Sines? Let me introduce you to Josh Lefebvre

9. Information on Lefebvre is a little more scarce but look what I found in this article many of us have probably seen & overlooked a dozen times….

Source: UVA School of Law Online

10. Given all this damaging evidence of bias in the Norman Moon courtroom, I have instructed my attorneys to put this in the court record & file a motion for recusal of Norman Moon. We will also be looking into having “Moon’s opinion” (wink, wink) in our offensive case vacated

11. Just noticed something else. Josh Lefebvre also appears to be in the “BEST OF FRIENDS” photo with Elizabeth Sines and Hutton Marshall.

The Motion to Recuse can be read here:

An additional Rule 59 Motion was filed last week, to have a recent dismissal ruling in the Kessler v Charlottesville case overturned for judicial error. In that ruling, Moon and his law clerks claimed that Charlottesville Police Chief Al Thomas had a right to order the police stand down and allow Heckler’s Veto violence.

This order led to rioting and the dispersal of the permitted rally before it was scheduled to take place. A Rule 59 Motion is a way of asking to have a judicial decision reversed based on judicial error and is one step that can be taken prior to an appeal.

Read the Rule 59 Motion here:

…

Judge Moon’s 2018 Law Clerk Dascher Pasco

Additionally I can confirm new, never before released evidence about Judge Moon’s law clerk from 2018, Dascher Pasco. Per National Justice, Pasco helped Moon decide several momentous decisions relating to Unite the Right during the 2018 term, including the Constitutionality of the Federal Rioting Act (See Rise Above Movement) and an order rejecting Motions to Dismiss lawsuits filed by Elizabeth Sines and Roberta Kaplan against rally organisers.

On the day of Unite the Right, Pasco took to Facebook to state that “chanting” and “horrible phrases” of Charlottesville marchers “disgusts me”. She implored her followers to “stand up against this hatred.”

As offensive as the phrase “Jews will not replace us” may be (chanted by trolls rather than rally organisers), it must be respected as Constitutionally protected speech. Dascher Pasco was in no position to decide for Judge Moon if words like these are Constitutionally protected speech or a “hate crime”.

In another rambling Facebook screed, Pasco implored her followers to, “Fight all racism as strongly as you fight anti-Semitism and fight it regardless of the speaker” (emphasis added).

While Pasco was president of the Jewish Law Student Association, its leadership submitted an editorial to the Virginia Law Weekly entitled Oppose Antisemitism in All Its Forms. It heavily referenced the Unite the Right rally, organiser Jason Kessler and made clear that its members could be counted on as judicial activists against anti-semitic speech. They claim to have “experienced anti-semitism directly on August 12th.”

As president of Virginia Law Women, she even went so far as to approve of my harassment at the UVA Law Library while I was trying to study for the Sines litigation.

Where we go from here

Within a few weeks Judge Moon will rule on both the Motions to Recuse and the Rule 59 Motion. If the Rule 59 Motion is successful Kessler v Charlottesville will be allowed to go forward into the discovery phase. This is good news for everyone who has been anxiously awaiting discovery of the August 12th text messages and emails the Heaphy Report says Police Chief Al Thomas deleted. Additionally, City Manager Maurice Jones had communications that day which he has refused to turn over through repeated FOIA requests.

If Moon decides to double down on bias in his courtroom we will next have to put in a Notice of Appeal to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

We fully expect that a fair analysis of the case will overturn Moon’s ruling and reiterate that police cannot allow a Heckler’s Veto without violating the Constitution.

That process will take about 18 months.

If however we still don’t get the ruling we are looking for, our only option will be to request a hearing before the Supreme Court. There is a plausible chance our case could be picked up because a refusal, by an appeals court, to acknowledge a Heckler’s Veto cause of action would trigger a conflict with every other court in the nation.

Such cases are given preference on the Supreme Court docket.

-Jason Kessler